Civil Candor

political cynicism for turbulent times

Copyright © 2023 CivilCandor.com

Home » Immigration » States, Politicians, and USCIS Suck Up to Childhood Arrivals

States, Politicians, and USCIS Suck Up to Childhood Arrivals

Last update June 24, 2013Leave a Comment

Childhood arrivals are threatening to take center stage in permissive states where politicians are falling over themselves to ensure that temporarily amnestied residents know who is on their side (see: Jobless? Illegals Are Laughing In Your Face Over Deferred Action.). With two of the largest illegal immigrant populations in the country, California and Illinois are racing neck and neck so both illegal immigrants and beneficiaries of the new Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) program are happy to call their state home.    

Lack of citizenship does not mean lack of political influence.

Overeager Illinois Democrats were quick to show their approval for the USCIS childhood arrivals policy. Before he joined Congressman Luis Gutierrez to launch a workshop to help illegal immigrants sign up for immunity from U.S. immigration law, Illinois Senator Dick Durbin called the program a “matter of justice” as he misrepresented the pool of eligibles:

The Obama Administration’s decision to extend temporary legal status to DREAM Act students is an historic humanitarian moment. This action will give these young immigrants their chance to come out of the shadows and be part of the only country they’ve ever called home.¹

Politicians pushing the USCIS policy forget that it is not the same thing as the DREAM Act. The program’s umbrella covers more than Durbin’s young immigrants and the childhood arrivals policy guidelines do not require that applicants be young or in school to receive their grant of immunity. They only need to prove that they graduated from high school, obtained a GED, or were discharged from the military.

Which state is better at sucking up to childhood arrivals, Illinois or California?

Illinois got the drop on California with a kickoff event at Navy Pier on August 15, 2012 attended by Senator Durbin, Congressman Luis Gutierrez, and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel. Not to be outdone, two California Congresswomen talked up their own August 24, 2012 venue to provide information and get the state’s illegal immigrants on the road to immunity, proclaiming:

This first step in assisting those who have worked tirelessly in helping our economy grow has been a long time coming.²  

With the passage of AB 2189 illegal immigrants in California who take advantage of the USCIS program can treat themselves to driver’s licenses. California beat Illinois to the punch on this one, but Illinois bested California when it came to ignoring ICE immigration detainers. Cook County had already come under scrutiny for its policy of disregarding detainers when Governor Jerry Brown rejected AB 1081, the “TRUST Act.” The bill would have legislated California’s resistance to holding illegal immigrants for federal authorities after they run afoul of the law. A letter to Brown signed by Nancy Pelosi and other House members called for “sensible limits” while trivializing ICE detainers:

By their own terms, immigration detainers are merely requests that a law enforcement agency continue to detain a person who should otherwise be released from custody.³

Washington set the tone by its shameless pandering to illegal immigrants.

States like California and Illinois are old hands at keeping their illegal immigrants content, boasting sanctuary cities (see: Sanctuary Cities Are No Havens for Taxpayers) and educational perks like reduced tuition and financial assistance. Washington is newer to the illegal immigrant entitlement game. With the childhood arrivals policy still fresh, questions are already being asked about USCIS’ implementation of deferred action and how the applications are being reviewed. Iowa’s Senator Chuck Grassley joined House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith in questioning whether a “Yes” during the application process was a foregone conclusion:

The signal being sent to adjudicators who process DACA applicants is clear: if they do not approve an application for DACA, then it will be reviewed by headquarters.  Their decisions will be scrutinized until they get to a yes.  This is unacceptable and must be rectified immediately so that adjudicators have the autonomy and authority to do what they are trained to do and to follow the letter of the law.4 

The childhood arrivals policy is amnesty in disguise. Like temporary tax hikes and other government lies, there is nothing temporary about deferred action. After illegal immigrants have filed their paperwork and paid a fee that is only $35.00 less than the $500 fine called for in most immigration amnesty bills, the next step will be easy.

References

Filed Under: Immigration

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Apotheosis of Washington. Architect of the Capitol.

Apotheosis of Washington
Architect of the Capitol

BROWSE

ICE's Operation Bullfighter: 19 arrests for drug trafficking, money laundering.

Operation Bullfighter
Courtesy ICE

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read More

In case of sale of your personal information, you may opt out by using the link Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (1) Marketing (0) Analytics (1) Preferences (0) Unclassified (1)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
NameDomainPurposeExpiryType
wpl_user_preference civilcandor.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
NameDomainPurposeExpiryType
_ga civilcandor.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
NameDomainPurposeExpiryType
_ga_R6V41C7WZK civilcandor.com --- 2 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings

Do you really wish to opt-out?