Civil Candor

political cynicism for turbulent times

Copyright © 2022 CivilCandor.com

Home » National Security and Foreign Affairs » TSA Report: New Shocker Proves We Need That Muslim Ban

TSA Report: New Shocker Proves We Need That Muslim Ban

Last update July 26, 2017Leave a Comment

Homeland Security must dread the release of new Government Accountability Office reports. The federal watchdog has a habit of finding chinks in the armor of agency plans to stop the bad guys. Past highlights include security technology problems at the border and trouble monitoring potentially dangerous flight school attendees post-9/11. Now we have a new TSA shocker about airline passenger screening that ferrets out suspicious behavior.

It’s not entirely fair to blame DHS or the TSA for the problems with airport screening. Politics has placed so much off limits that security gurus are forced to tiptoe around the truth. As much as we want to keep dangerous people off of airplanes and out of the country there are just too many voices screeching to the heavens, demanding that we don’t scrutinize or profile.

Airport screening of travelers. TSA Report: shaky evidence for spotting the bad guys. Courtesy U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

TSA Report: shaky evidence for good vs. bad
Courtesy DHS

Disturbing new numbers on TSA strategy

The word got out last Friday. TSA’s behavioral methods don’t have a lot of evidence or science behind them, including 28 of the 36 behavioral signs it uses to identify potential terrorists.1

These findings aren’t new. They go back to a November 2013 report and lead to the same place that eventually ended SBInet: a recommendation to watch the dollars that go into something that might not have any value.2

TSA Report is a shocker, but it’s what we asked for

It’s tough to balance frightening Homeland Security warnings like this update from last week:

Evaluated intelligence indicates that terrorist groups continue to target commercial aviation and are aggressively pursuing innovative methods to undertake their attacks, to include smuggling explosive devices in various consumer items.3

… with statements like this from ex-DNC boss Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who uses the discriminatory label “Muslim ban” instead of “security restrictions”:

The Supreme Court’s decision to allow portions of President Trump’s Muslim and refugee ban to take effect sends a terrible message to the world, does nothing to make America safer, and disregards our national values.4

Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) came out even stronger against limiting travel:

This disgrace will not make our country safer. It betrays the American values those of us who served in uniform fought to defend.5

Duckworth never mentioned how many service members have died at the hands of radicals who want to kill Americans because of our religion and values. Blaming America for shunning Islam does more political damage. We do know how many could die if someone with bad intentions hops onto a commercial jetliner. Instead, we blame Trump for doing whatever it takes rather than taking a chance.

That’s where the TSA report reflects the desperate position we’ve put airline security personnel in. The problem isn’t the numbers. The problem is that we won’t permit profiling, restrict travel, or do anything else that selects for the people most likely to be terrorists.

When our values threaten Americans lives to satisfy Democratic Party bigwigs, what good are they?

TSA is hog-tied by Democrats

We could have prevented a liberal “Muslim Ban” and simply called the new travel restrictions what they are. Instead, Democrats prefer to wage war with offensive labels and inflammatory remarks.

Look to recent attacks in Europe if you don’t believe there are terrorists out there. They exist and for the most part are radicalized Muslims, but PC leftists who influence U.S. policy would rather risk lives than admit the truth. For the time being, instead of observing the obvious we are stuck with behavioral signs that may or may not work and are certainly a lot less reliable than limiting entry with common sense exceptions.

Sources

1 “TSA Does Not Have Valid Evidence Supporting Most of the Revised Behavioral Indicators Used in Its Behavior Detection Activities.” GAO-17-608R: July 20, 2017. http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-17-608R, retrieved July 25, 2017. p. 4.

2. Ibid.,

3. “Fact Sheet: Aviation Security Enhancements for Select Last Point of Departure Airports with Commercial Flights to the United States (Updated July 21, 2017).” Homeland Security. July 21, 2017. https://www.dhs.gov/news/2017/03/21/fact-sheet-aviation-security-enhancements-
select-last-point-departure-airports, retrieved July 24, 2017.

4. “Wasserman Schultz on Supreme Court Review of Trump Muslim Ban.” Debbie Wasserman Schultz.” June 26, 2017. https://wassermanschultz.house.gov/press-releases/wasserman-schultz-on-supreme-court-review-of-trump-muslim-ban/, retrieved July 24, 2017.

5. “Trump’s Muslim Ban Implementation Just As Illogical, Discriminatory, and Un-American” Tammy Duckworth. June 29, 2017. https://www.duckworth.senate.gov/content/trump%E2%80%99s-muslim-ban-implementation-just-illogical-discriminatory-un-american, retrieved July 24, 2017.

Photo: “A TSA officer assists a traveler at the checkpoint.” Transportation Security Administration. https://www.tsa.gov/photos/tsa-job, retrieved July 25, 2017.

Filed Under: National Security and Foreign Affairs

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Apotheosis of Washington. Architect of the Capitol.

Apotheosis of Washington
Architect of the Capitol

BROWSE

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read More

In case of sale of your personal information, you may opt out by using the link Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (1) Marketing (0) Analytics (1) Preferences (0) Unclassified (1)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
NameDomainPurposeExpiryType
wpl_user_preference civilcandor.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
NameDomainPurposeExpiryType
_ga civilcandor.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
NameDomainPurposeExpiryType
_ga_R6V41C7WZK civilcandor.com --- 2 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings

Do you really wish to opt-out?