Civil Candor

political cynicism for turbulent times

Copyright © 2023 CivilCandor.com

Home » Big Government » Public Employees » Government Should End Social Security Retirement Promises

Government Should End Social Security Retirement Promises

Last update December 31, 2017Leave a Comment

When did dependence become an American value? From the deterioration of Social Security to the crisis over public sector pensions, Democrats and their special interest supporters are warning constituents that their retirements are in jeopardy while claiming that there is an implicit guarantee from government to provide. Voters should be ignoring agenda-based pleas, and need to question the sanity of limiting their retirement prospects to campaign promises and the government dole.

If we learned anything from the past few years, it is how tenuous financial security can be.  Houses lose value. Investments decline. Jobs disappear. Amidst news stories that Americans have decided to save at precisely the wrong time, we are harangued about the uncertainty of Social Security, and the threat of public sector workers becoming paupers if state budget shortfalls mandate changes to pension benefits.

Unions and the Democratic Party have joined forces to get the jump on Republicans for the 2012 election. Illinois, with its overwhelming pension debt, is a focus of organized labor’s We Are One campaign. Television and radio spots inform voters that pensions paid for with contributions from workers’ paychecks are the life savings of public sector employees.

In the private sector, employment guarantees nothing. Health insurance benefits are revoked, salaries cut, and 401(k) matches are eliminated with a memo or an email. Government is a late adopter, and public workers are a powerful voting bloc, so state and local governments maintain the antiquated notion that their employees are entitled to cradle to the grave security. The uprising against states trying to make public worker benefits affordable shows how ingrained the belief in public employee entitlement has become.

While limiting one’s prospects to the promise of a government pension or the fading guarantee of Social Security is foolish and short-sighted, politicians and media campaigns are reinforcing the strength of government promises of retirement security. Instead of focusing on affordability and state budget issues, politicians have turned the Wisconsin fracas into an argument over fairness and rights. Nancy Pelosi told us:

I stand in solidarity with the Wisconsin workers fighting for their rights, especially all the students and young people leading the charge, again, for fairness and for opportunity in their community.¹

President Obama tells us that Social Security income will be sufficient to provide for retirement:

Since 1935, it has been expanded to include dependent and survivor benefits, disability insurance, and guaranteed medical insurance for seniors through Medicare.

It is a lasting promise that we can retire with dignity and peace of mind, that workers who become disabled can support themselves, and that families who suffer the loss of a loved one will not live in poverty.²

The president mentioned the expansions that have helped to deplete the trust with a laundry list of beneficiaries. When FDR signed the Social Security Act, he told us that Social Security was no more than supplemental income:

But we have tried to frame a law which will give some measure of protection to the average citizen and to his family against the loss of a job and against poverty-ridden old age.³

Harry Reid, on the other hand, is telling voters that Social Security is a retirement guarantee:

It promises all Americans that if they work hard and play by the rules, they can retire and live in dignity.4

Taxpayers cannot afford to rely on government assurances of financial security through employment or entitlements. It is reprehensible for our president, or any politician, to be telling Americans that Social Security will allow them to retire with dignity. It can’t, and it won’t.

Public sector jobs and benefits should be considered no less tenuous than their private sector counterparts. Lifetime pensions and health care benefits are an increasing rarity in the private sector, and for good reason. They are not affordable, and not sustainable. Government needs to get out of the pension business, and for current workers and those yet to be hired, that means an empty 401(k) bucket to fill, and a gold-plated list of private health insurers on the last day of work. The economic crisis was not the fault of private or public sector employees, but those who choose to depend on government and the promises of politicians for their futures will have only themselves  to blame for the pitiful inadequacy of their retirement years.

Sources

Filed Under: Public Employees Tagged With: pension crisis

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Apotheosis of Washington. Architect of the Capitol.

Apotheosis of Washington
Architect of the Capitol

BROWSE

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read More

In case of sale of your personal information, you may opt out by using the link Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (1) Marketing (0) Analytics (1) Preferences (0) Unclassified (1)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
NameDomainPurposeExpiryType
wpl_user_preference civilcandor.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
NameDomainPurposeExpiryType
_ga civilcandor.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
NameDomainPurposeExpiryType
_ga_R6V41C7WZK civilcandor.com --- 2 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings

Do you really wish to opt-out?